Sovereign Waters: Kiribati’s Climate Standoff
Cover image of the case

Sovereign Waters: Kiribati’s Climate Standoff

A crisis-leadership simulation where participants navigate a non-linear climate disruption and foreign fleet fee ultimatum in Kiribati. Ideal for exploring the BANI framework, trade-off analysis under liquidity constraints, and climate adaptation financing.

University of Bristol

Set in Tarawa, Kiribati, this decision simulation places learners in the role of Senior Policy Advisor to Minister Kiritian Tebano at the Ministry of Marine Resources (KMMR). Facing an irreversible 0.1°C sea surface temperature warming that has driven primary tuna stocks eastward out of Kiribati's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the state is hit with an ultimatum from an international commercial fishing fleet consortium: cut Vessel Day Scheme (VDS) access fees by 35% immediately or face total fleet relocation by January 1. With license fees accounting for 70% of state revenue ($137M baseline) and liquid treasury reserves holding under 60 days of civil service payroll ($18.5M), participants must navigate acute state liquidity constraints alongside a 60% collapse in coastal reef fish catches across outer atolls.

Grounding their analysis in the BANI Economic Resilience Framework (Brittleness, Anxiety, Non-linearity, Incomprehensibility), learners evaluate four mutually exclusive policy paths: granting fee concessions (Option A), issuing exploratory seabed mining permits in a marine protected area (Option B), executing an immediate unilateral domestic mariculture pivot (Option C), or adopting dynamic regional pool licensing under the Parties to the Nauru Agreement (PNA) combined with Green Climate Fund (GCF) co-financing (Option D).

The simulation leads participants through multi-source quantitative and qualitative data inspection, progressive diagnostic decision questions, a high-stakes AI roleplay where they defend their recommendation against direct executive stress-testing by Minister Tebano, and a written justification paper. Key teaching moments center on distinguishing non-linear climate tipping points from routine market volatility, evaluating operational timing lags, and structuring non-debt climate adaptation strategies under extreme fiscal pressure.

Learning objectives

  • How to facilitate debriefs on non-linear climate disruptions versus routine commercial volatility using the BANI Economic Resilience Framework.
  • How to guide learners through trade-off discrimination when balancing immediate liquid payroll constraints against multi-year development lags.
  • How to highlight the strategic application of multilateral climate transition capital (GCF) and dynamic regional revenue pooling (PNA) to solve structural state brittleness.

About the authors

LiveCase Studio creates interactive, evidence-grounded simulation experiences designed to build strategic judgment, executive communication, and crisis leadership skills in complex environments.

LiveCase Studio

Educational design studio specializing in interactive, evidence-grounded decision simulations for executive education, strategic leadership, and public policy analysis.

Who is this for?

Mid-to-senior executives, public sector policy leaders, and postgraduate students in strategy, crisis management, environmental economics, or public administration. No prior fisheries experience required.

Pricing

$2.5 / seatDegree Granting Course
$5/ seatNon-Degree Granting Course

Duration: ~7mins

Works on: Desktop, mobile, tablets

Requires: Web browser

Categories: Strategy,Leadership,Crisis Management

Share

FAQ

What is a LiveCase?

LiveCase is an educational and training simulation tool that immerses participants into a situation.
Please feel free to reach out to us for a demo.

How can I get a demo?

Simply contact us and we'll be happy to give you a demo.

Are there Teaching notes?

Yes! For all cases authored by LiveCase we can provide extensive Teaching Notes.
We can't make them public to avoid participants getting a hold of them, but you can simply reach out to us.

Do the participants pay or does the instructor?

You get to choose in the next step. If you "Host" (Instruct) the case, you can pick during the setup if you want to pay for the participants or they pay by themselves.

When do I/we need to pay?

We offer several options for payment depending on the situations

If you are Hosting

  • If the participants pay for the case, they will be requested to pay before joining the case.
  • If the host pays, we ask you to purchase your expected number of seats. If you need more, you can purchase more later. If you bought too many, please contact us to arrange a reimbursement.
  • Get pre-approved: You can get pre-approved for Invoice billing at a later date. If interested, please reach out to us.
How long do I have after I pay?

The purchase of the seat has no time limit except if the case is removed (hasn't happened yet), or if the methodology has changed too much.
In the extremely unlikely scenario, you can simply contact us for a reimbursement.

My payment isn't going through?

If there is a problem with the payment, please contact us and we will be happy to help.

Contact us