Punch the Monkey: The Viral Hug

This MBA LiveCase immerses participants in a high-stakes brand management scenario, casting them as a Senior Brand Strategist at Nordic Nestings, a global home furnishings retailer based in Stockholm. The core challenge revolves around navigating an unexpected viral phenomenon involving one of their beloved plush toys and an orphaned red panda cub at the Seoul Grand Park Zoo. Participants are tasked with leading a cross-functional incident response team to develop and justify a public statement, balancing immense marketing opportunity with significant ethical and reputational risks, all under intense media scrutiny and time pressure.

The simulation commences with the initial discovery of the viral sensation, where conflicting perspectives immediately emerge from the Global Marketing Lead and the Senior Data Analyst regarding the scale and implications of the event. As global media outlets begin to inquire, the pressure mounts, forcing participants to confront a rapidly evolving situation where a massive opportunity for brand visibility clashes directly with potential ethical pitfalls. This opening sequence establishes the urgent context and introduces the diverse stakeholder viewpoints that will shape the subsequent decision-making process.

Next, participants are introduced to Nordic Nestings' proprietary 4-Filter Ethical Evaluation Framework, a structured tool designed for assessing public responses in emotionally charged situations. This critical framework, encompassing Intent, Proportionality, Proximity, and Longevity, becomes the central lens through which all potential actions must be scrutinized. The scenario requires participants to rigorously apply this framework, dissecting arguments from colleagues who champion aggressive commercialization versus those advocating extreme caution. This phase is crucial for developing the analytical rigor needed to move beyond immediate reactions and build a robust, ethically defensible strategy.

The culmination of the LiveCase involves a decisive moment where participants must commit to one of three distinct strategic options: an aggressive marketing campaign, complete corporate silence, or a public distancing and redirection of focus. Following this critical decision, an AI-driven role-play with the Head of Global Communications challenges participants to articulate and defend their chosen path. This interaction demands a comprehensive justification based on the 4-Filter Framework, simulating the intensity of executive-level accountability and refining their ability to present a well-reasoned, principled recommendation under direct questioning.

Upon completing the simulation, participants gain invaluable practical skills in ethical brand management, strategic decision-making under pressure, and stakeholder alignment. They learn to critically evaluate public response options, ensuring actions are aligned with long-term brand reputation and genuine customer service, rather than merely capitalizing on fleeting trends. The experience solidifies the understanding that successful navigation of viral events requires a nuanced approach that prioritizes integrity and future defensibility, thereby building enduring trust and mitigating risks of brand damage in the dynamic digital landscape.